tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1943725453714413024.post8556155784290227273..comments2023-11-02T04:31:12.118-04:00Comments on Life in boxes: Really, Sarah Palin??lifeinboxeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14373615837965411929noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1943725453714413024.post-23832281137357040972008-10-23T02:16:00.000-04:002008-10-23T02:16:00.000-04:00The clothes and whatnot are meant to motivate and ...The clothes and whatnot are meant to motivate and energize potential McCain voters, and if the clothes piss off devoted Democrats, I don't think the RNC is going to be crying about it. A lot of Palin's appeal is based on whatever image will get people excited. And looking good is a big part of it. Besides, they've probably done all they could on making her appear capable. Really, given their situation what should the RNC spend their $150,000 on that would clearly make more sense?<BR/><BR/>I have no idea, but wouldn't Hillary's bill have been comparable? I do remember them testing four different colors of the same pantsuit before her talk at the Convention, so it didn't seem like she was being frugal either. And the article itself talks about $3,000 for two hairstyling appointments in '06. And that can't be donated to charity.<BR/><BR/>It's all part of the billion dollar game.<BR/><BR/>Not sure why the big "PuhLEASE" with selling the clothes for charity?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com